Disadvantages of website updating

Whenever we talk about engaging communities online we are inevitably questioned about “exclusion” issues. And, just because a technique is new that doesn’t mean it has to solve every single problem to be worthwhile.What socio-demographic group does this technology favour? As with any and all community engagement techniques, online community engagement is not a panacea. It is a relatively easy technology for some and relatively more difficult for others. What follows is drawn from a post on Wikiversity about online education.Word Press is definitely the world's most popular CMS.

The script is not protected as well as other applications.

It all depends on how sesitive is the additional content of your page.

Another problem arises when you need to choose a plugin for a specific functionality.

Among all the thousands of plugins, most of them have their clones.

Note: You can find a significantly updated and expanded version of this post describing the benefits of online communication for community engagement here, and another describing the disadvantages of online communication of community engagement here.

I found this on Wikiversity, one of the many resources on Wikipedia, today.

Modifying tables or graphics format can be more complicated than in other applications like Quick. Queries can be complex since all additional non-standard fields that make Word Press a CMS, require additional syntax.

Word Press is a very good script to create a simple website.

It means, that any given functionality can be added by several different plugins created by different authors.

Tags: , ,